Apparently 23andMe, the biotech company that offered personalized genotyping reports, is going bankrupt and people are urging customers to request the deletion of their data given the likelihood the information may fall into the hands of government agencies that will use it to create bioweapons fashioned to target YOU. Or something. A friend reached out about this today and I responded: “I got tests done for both Akemi and I to check for potential genetic predispositions to certain conditions and diseases. According to the results, my carrier status detected no variants of concern, however I am apparently predisposed to consuming more caffeine than the average person but less likely to be a deep sleeper. Also, my muscle composition is similar to that of elite power athletes. But, of course, none of this is surprising. On the other hand, the Traits Report specify that I am both “less likely than average to be afraid of heights” and “less likely to hate chewing sounds” which really causes me to question the validity of the entire process.
Discover more from Joseph Mallozzi's Weblog
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Podcast also available on PocketCasts, SoundCloud, Spotify, Google Podcasts, Apple Podcasts, and RSS.
6 responses
-
From the tournament choices, one might assume you are as old as I am.
-
So, if you got a clone made (for free) with your DNA, could you then upload your consciousness to the clone, Asgard-style? I’m sure AI will somehow figure out the degenerative replication thing soon, so you’re probably good for a few thou years.
-
An excellent sci-fi premise.
-
-
I just had this conversation with someone I thought was sane. No way, no how was she going to do her DNA. I didn’t ask why, but she did mention how law enforcement uses it to catch criminals. I said if my DNA helps catch a killer and give a family closure, so be it. Of course, if I was planning on doing some dirty deeds, then that’s a different story, “I s’pooose.” (From a movie – can you name it? Hint: It’s British.)
Your DNA, Joe, really reflects the extent of the Roman Empire. The Northern African and Western Asia (Israel, perhaps?) suggests either immigrants or enslaved people from Roman territories brought into Italy. I had a dash of Italian show up, then a dash of Jewish, then both went away and now I’m showing the Balkans. My DNA hasn’t changed, just the way it’s compared.
The reason for it is this: I believe to be a DNA data base contributor for Ancestry, a person must prove that their ancestors have lived in a given region for 500 years. Some cultures can do that easily. Europeans through church records, Koreans through meticulous family documentation, and the peoples from the various regions of Africa due to close tribal ties (including culture, languages, and even physical appearances) that go back for centuries. But some people, such as Native Americans, can have difficulty establishing their ancestry since records are sparse, tribes have been annihilated, and superstitions prevent some from donating to the data base. (However, native peoples from Spanish America who converted to Catholicism early on often have good family records through the church.)
When DNA testing for the masses first started, the baseline data was sparse. In some places, only one or two people matched the criteria, while in other areas hundreds of people were able to donate to the data base. Over the years, more people qualified to be added to the base samples, thus refining our DNA results. For instance, when I got my first DNA results, I was mostly just ‘British Isles’ and Northwestern Europe, with a little bit of African. But now my DNA more accurately reflects my Danish paternal grandfather and my PA Dutch and Prussian maternal grandfather. My maternal grandmother – being from Charleston, SC – had the African and Scottish ancestry, while I now think that my paternal grandmother – who we always thought was just ‘English’ – must have been a mix of German, Scottish, and Scandinavian, although the family names on her side are distinctly English. Hmmm. I need to do some further investigation into her side of the family…
So, without any further ado-do, my DNA is as follows:
34% Germanic Europe (22% Mom, 12% Dad)
33% Denmark (Dad)
17% Scotland (16% Mom, 1% Dad)
4% Sweden (Dad)
The rest is all mom’s side:
3% England & Northwestern Europe
2% Ivory Coast & Ghana
2% Central & Eastern Europe
2% The Balkans
1% MaliEthnic groups
1% Western Bantu Peoples
1% WalesSo, it seems I’m mostly Viking, Highlander, and Hessian…lol.
Here’s a photograph of my great-great uncle, Arthur L. Macbeth, a professional African-American photographer, and his children. His son, Hugh, was educated through Harvard and went on to be a civil rights attorney, defending Japanese interns during WW2. His sister, my great grandmother, passed for white and married a white man, while Arthur remained in the black community. They all moved their families north in the early 1900s, Arthur to Baltimore, and my great-grandparents to Philadelphia.
das
-
Oh, absolutely had you pegged as a Viking.
-
What gave it away? Certainly it’s not a penchant for surströmming, because I wouldn’t touch that stuff with a 100-foot pole! (Have YOU ever tried it?)
das
-
-






Leave a Reply